¹Sri Lestari Handayani, ²Iwan Erar Joesoef

¹,²Faculty of Law, University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, RS. Fatmawati Street, South Jakarta City, 12450

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i7-50

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research was conducted to investigate the obstacles to asset recovery for the proceeds of money laundering deposited in offshore bank accounts, as mandated in Law Number 8 of 2010. The issues raised in this study are about the relationship between corruption and money laundering. As well as law enforcement in the monetary sector in Indonesia through the criminal approach and Asset Recovery in the Money Laundering case. Based on the research, it was found that the recovery of assets resulting from money laundering that was stored abroad experienced obstacles due to differences in legal concepts (money laundering and assets proceeds from money laundering). The research was conducted through juridical normative methods and data collection. It is concluded that the Asset Recovery approach is more of a deterrent effect for the perpetrators of corruption than punishment. To facilitate the withdrawal of money laundering funds abroad, a bilateral cooperation agreement between the Indonesian and recipient countries of money laundering assets is necessary.

Keywords

Money Laundering, Corruption Crime, Asset Recovery.

REFERENCES

Book
1) Farid, Zainal Abidin. 2007. Hukum Pidana 1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

2) Financial and Development Audit Agency (BPKP). 2000. Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi Nasional. March edition.

3) Effendi, Erdianto. 2011. Hukum Pidana Indonesia-Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

4) Edi Setiadi dan Rena Yulia. 2010. Hukum Pidana Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

5) Harkrisnowo, Harkristuti. 2003. Kriminalisasi Pemutihan Uang: Tinjauan Terhadap UU No.15 tahun 2002, Proceedings Kerjasama Pusat kajian Hukum dan Mahkamah Agung RI, cet.I. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

6) Hoefnagels, G.P. 1972. The Other Side of Criminology. Kluwer- Deventer, Holand.

7) Husein, Yunus. 2007. Bunga Rampai Anti Pencucian Uang, Bandung: Books Terrace & Library.

8) Muladi and Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2005. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

9) Muladi and Nawawi, Barda. 1992. Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

10) Nilsson, Hans G. 1996. Preface, in Paolo Bernasconi (ED), Money Laundering and Banking Secrecy, General Report of Xi Vth International Congress of Comparative Law. Athens.

11) Prakoso, Djoko. 1988. Surat Dakwaan, Tuntutan Pidana dan Eksaminasi Perkara di Dalam Proses Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Legislation
1) Indonesia, 1945, Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

2) Indonesia, 2010, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2010 concerning prevention of the Crime of Money Laundering.
Journals and Thesis
1) Amrullah, M. Arief, “Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Pengantar Pemahaman Awal Bagi Peserta Pendidikan Kurator)”, papers submitted to Curator and Management Education, organized by Himpunan Kurator dan Pengurus Indonesia (HKPI), Jakarta: Alberto Ballroom, Belleza Suite, May, 28th , 2016

2) Bahreisy, Budi, “Implementasi Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Terhadap Kerugian Negara Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol 15 No.2, July 2018, Medan: Universitas Dharmawangsa Medan.

3) Dittipideksus, “Kajian Hukum: Penerapan Delik Pencucian Uang Untuk Tujuan Pemidanaan Dan Asset Recovery”, Jakarta: Bareskrim, November 2019.
Website 1) M.G. Novrizal Fernandez, “Penyidik Belum Maksimalkan UU TPPU Untuk Sita Aset Koruptor”, https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20180114/16/726258/penyidik-belum-maksimalkan-uu-tppu-untuk-sita-aset-koruptor.

2) Billy Steel, “Money Loundering - What is Money laundering," http/www.laundryman.u-net.com.

3) Saputra, A. “Babak Baru Sengketa Aset Koperasi Pandawa Rp 3,3 Triliun”, https://news.detik.com/berita /d4534163/babak-baru-sengketa-aset-koperasi-pandawa-rp-33-triliun

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 07 JULY 2021